Tuesday, September 22, 2009

ACORN Pt 1

Almost a week ago I told you that I was working on a blog about the ACORN scandal. I hope by now you've all heard about it. For those of you who are reading this on Facebook I don't know how you could have NOT heard about it since I've posted at least 12,000 links per day since last Thursday or so. I've been talking about the scandal with friends, one named Kat in particular all week and there are a few themes that have emerged since the videos were initially released. (By the way. If you don't know what I'm talking about you can see all the videos here in reverse chronological order or here where there are now loads of articles and opinion pieces and information with historical context. I had planned on having this blog up this morning, but found myself distracted by the amount of information I could cover. I could recount the whole history of ACORN back to it's founding and do a play by play of where it could have led. I wanted to have a polished, possibly publishable post (not that I would have submitted it anywhere). Now I recognize that I am allowing myself to be paralyzed by my desire for perfection. So I'm just going to go ahead and do this in a few installments. The first one is my initial gut reaction followed by a question and what I believe to be a possible answer to that question.

Summary of events in the videos: James O'Keefe III (25) and Hannah Giles (20) dressed as a pimp and prostitute. This was their method -

1) Ask A Question: What if a “prostitute” and her alleged law school boyfriend walk into ACORN seeking housing for an underage brothel to fund his future congressional campaign?

2) Do Background Research:
Learn as much about ACORN housing procedures and protocol as possible.
History of ACORN and their effect on the United States

3) Construct a Hypothesis: ACORN is corrupt and it is in their nature to promote and disguise illegal behavior.

4) Experiment: Baltimore, DC, Brooklyn, San Bernardino, and…

5) Analyze and draw a conclusion.

(the above was written by Hannah Giles on 9/15/09 after videos of the 4th city were released)

Part 1:

I saw the videos when they first came out. I think that I was maybe a day behind. The Baltimore ones were first.
In the videos James and Hannah told the ACORN workers that in addition to Hannah working at the house as a prostitute the pair were planning on bringing 12-13 under age El Salvedorean girls to work as prostitutes also. Instead of verbalizing shock and outrage, or even an moment of ungaurded disgust, the ACORN employee suggested that they claim up to 3 of them as dependents on the falsified tax forms she was already working on.

I was horrified. Despite the fact that I knew that the girls mentioned by the pair were completely fictitious I couldn't help but think of all the REAL girls who are traded into sexual slavery every day around the globe and here in the United States. Before my eyes, I saw a woman who wasn't playing games, who believed that these girls existed and would be coming to her town and instead of suggesting to Hannah and James that they not bring the girls over, or calling the police, she told Hannah and James to claim three as dependents, but not more than that because it'll raise a red flag. From Baltimore it only got worse. DC, Brooklyn, NY, San Bernardino all were willing to aide these two in their attempts to 1) defraud the government and 2) cover up the importation of little girls to work as sex workers at this house which ACORN was helping Hannah get.

San Diego was worst of all (if that's possible.) The ACORN worker claimed to be a lawyer in Mexico. When he was told about the girls he wasn't very moved by the information. James asked where should they have the girls cross the border, "Tijuana or somewhere more inland?" "Tijuana." "Why?" James asked. "Because I have contacts there," the man replied.

It literally makes me sick to think of people who are willing to stand by when they come face-to-face with those who would injure and abuse little girls (or anyone) and then help them along in the process. That was my first reaction. Pure, gut-wrenching, horror and sadness and anger. I began to wonder, "How can this happen? Would I do the same thing if I were in their shoes?"

My conclusion was that there was a complete absence of an idea of personal responsibility on the part of the ACORN workers. Personal responsibility works internally – "I’m not going to do something. I’m going to restrain myself. Because I’m going to be held accountable for my actions." When you’re thinking all the time, “I’m going to be held accountable for MY ACTIONS” whether that be by myself, by my family, by society, or by God you behave in a certain way. You analyze everything you do. "How do my actions affect people? How does is affect and reflect on me?" When you, alternately, grow up and are ingrained with a victim mindset, whether you believe you are a victim, all women are victims, poor people are victims – your actions become irrelevant at worst and of nominal importance at best. Because nothing a victim has done or could do would have stopped them from being victimized. It’s the fault of the perpetrator.


The ACORN workers were faced with a conundrum. They were confronted by people working in an illegal business who had been denied the opportunity to get a housing loan. James and Hannah were therefore victims. Then they were confronted with the idea of victims in the underage girls James and Hannah said they were bringing over. The ACORN workers had a choice – who’s advocate would they be? Would they protect and help the victims right in front of them (who would also serve to add to the numbers they needed and would therefore be part of the incentive progam set up by ACORN)? Or the ACTUAL victims, a dozen underage girls being brought from a foreign country into a brothel where they would be sold into sex slavery. In EVERY case ACORN sided with the “victim” in front of them.


Hand in hand with this "victim" ideology is one of political correctness gone terribly awry. We are now told that, with a few specific exceptions, we cannot tell anyone they are wrong. One would have assumed that child slavery was one of those things you could call someone on the carpet for. But on at least one occasion an ACORN worker said she wouldn't do it (not because it was wrong, but because it was RISKY) but that "you wouldn't listen anyway." What happened to ‘be the change you want to see in the world’? If they believe that no one will listen when they speak, that nothing they do will affect anyone, then why were they even at ACORN in the first place?


Then again, maybe I give to much credit.
Perhaps all those ACORN people simply lack any kind of moral compass.

Part 2
- Corruption in government
(- Media complicity?)

Monday, September 14, 2009

More ACORN

Another video by Giles and O'Keefe. The similarities between the advice given by the employees of three different, "isolated" incidents is hard to ignore.

Friday, September 11, 2009

ACORN

I was going to write a big huge blog about ACORN, but I'll link to the original story and copy the text, then make some observations.

Chaos for Glory: My Time With ACORN

by James O'Keefe

A famous community organizer once said, “The only way to upset the power structure in your communities is to goad them, confuse them, irritate them and, most of all, make them live by their own rules.  If you make them live by their own rules, you destroy them.” Impossible demands can irritate modern leftists in ways nothing else can, whether it’s by banning Lucky Charms cereal because it’s racist against Irish people, calling Planned Parenthood saying you want to donate money for black abortions in the name of Margaret Sanger, or making Sen. Snowe sign an oversized bailout check for a billion dollars to Amtrak, in her own office.

embedded by Embedded Video

~

embedded by Embedded Video

The scenario we posed the ACORN Housing employees in Baltimore is due to the application of similar power tactics. We gave ACORN a taste of its own medicine.  ACORN was alleged to be thug-like, criminal, and nefarious.  This criminal behavior was evidenced by a video of Baltimore ACORN community organizers breaking the locks on foreclosed homes.  Instead of railing against their radicalism, it is best to bring out this type of radicalism. Hannah Giles and I took advantage of ACORN’s regard for thug criminality by posing the most ridiculous criminal scenario we could think of and seeing if they would comply–which they did without hesitation.

Additionally, instead of focusing on foreclosure itself, which has become seemingly as politicized as abortion, we focused on crimes more difficult for the left to defend: trafficking of young helpless girls and tax evasion. The first group represents the severely disadvantaged, the second a threat to the distribution of wealth.

While manipulation or entrapment occurs when people are encouraged to do things they otherwise wouldn’t, the pre-set trap is their own.  These tactics allow the viewer to see ACORN’s soul; their playing field and their morality, out in the open.  Their system is based on conflict and change for its own sake.  This system is based on totalitarian principles and class war techniques. These people understand pressure, power and self-interest.  When the Baltimore employees saw we were shady dealers, their instincts clicked in, as we were prime recruits.

ACORN has ascended.  They elect our politicians and receive billions in tax money. Their world is a revolutionary, socialistic, atheistic world, where all means are justifiable.  And they create chaos, again, for it’s own sake.  It is time for us to be studying and applying their tactics, many of which are ideologically neutral.  It is time, as Hannah said as we walked out of the ACORN facility, for conservative activists to “create chaos for glory.”

Listen to the complete audio here.

View the complete transcript here.

*         *          *        *          *             *           *           *            *            *            *             *              *  

Check out the transcripts.  The thing that infuriates me the most is that these women were not shocked, or hesitant at all about how to help a pimp and prostitute not only commit tax fraud but also cover up UNDERAGE SEX WORKERS from El Salvador they claimed would be arriving in "2-3 months"!  The only thing they said was "cover your ass."  "Make sure the girls go to school so you can cover your ass."  That is SO VERY SAD to me.  ACORN keeps saying that these are isolated incidents, but the wealth of knowledge the "volunteers" had about evading taxes and "covering your ass"  COMPLETELY debunks that. 

They also said repeatedly "I'm not hearing this." And, "I don't know anything about this." 

I am so sick about this.  To think that our tax money has been used to help people evade federal taxes and/or protect sex traffickers is mind blowing. 

This is a link to a video of the second incident

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

RiP! A Remix Manifesto

I watched an interesting and thought provoking documentary tonight. The film centers around "GirlTalk" an artist who remixes and mashes popular songs to make new and sometimes surprising music. The obvious issue is that he's infringing on the copyrights of hundreds of artists... or at least that's what some would say.

I'm a firm (though perhaps not so firm as I once was) believer that if you make something you ought to be paid for it. This film challenges that philosophy by suggesting that if you put something out into the world it ought to become public domain and that other people can use it as a creative outlet themselves and so on and so on. It's an interesting question, one that I'll continue to wrestle with. I come away with it thinking a couple of things.

1) What GirlTalk does is art. There's a clip that shows the documentarian playing a video of GirlTalk making one of his mashups for the head of the US Copyright Agency. She's clearly impressed (as was I) by the way he made his songs.
2) I'm tempted to think "big corporations are bad." But I don't actually believe they are bad. I do believe they are rigid. I think record labels, and publishing companies are boxing themselves into an unnecessarily sticky situation. Clearly the music industry is changing. Instead of tightening your grip and squeezing out really talented artists they need to adapt. (I know none of that is particularly revelatory.)
3) It's an artist's perogative. If a singer or band had the philosophy that their music is made just so people can hear it and they have no problem with illegal downloading, and music sharing and mashups - great. Fantastic. But if an artist or band feels that their copyrights are being infringed upon and that they want royalties for their music, isn't that their right?
4) I'm pretty much as confused as ever.

One last note. I found the explanation of the expansion of copyright laws fascinating.

What do YOU think?

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Autumn


Picture taken in Edinburgh by myself in fall '07


I think "autumn" is such a pretty word.

It was cool out Monday morning. I'd hoped it was a harbinger of cooler weather to come, but not so. I'm ready for it to be fall. I'm ready to run in cool weather, wear layers, and sweaters and scarves. Yay scarves! And cute hats. I'm ready ready ready.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

The universe is part of this one cry,
That every life is noted and cherished,
And nothing loved is ever lost or perished.




Madeleine L'Engle

Saturday, June 20, 2009